Submitted by Eelco Visser on 18 September 2013 at 14:00

On 18 September 2013 at 14:00 Eelco Visser tagged 39

On 11 November 2013 at 15:00 Elmer van Chastelet commented:

Any more info on this issue/how to reproduce?


On 13 November 2013 at 17:23 Elmer van Chastelet commented:

My guess: grades are only propagated from 1 level under currently viewed collection grades.

level1   level2   level3

AssignmentA
 |
 |---AssignmentB
 |         |
 |         |---AssignmentC
 |         |---AssignmentD

In this example, when viewing grades for AssignmentA (level1), it will only look for grades in its direct children at level2.
In turn, the grades of AssignmentB (level2) may or may not have been updated with its lower level assignment grades.


On 9 December 2013 at 10:06 Elmer van Chastelet removed tag 39

On 9 December 2013 at 10:06 Elmer van Chastelet tagged 40

On 7 January 2014 at 11:02 Elmer van Chastelet removed tag 40

On 7 January 2014 at 11:02 Elmer van Chastelet tagged 41

On 3 February 2014 at 17:34 Elmer van Chastelet removed tag 41

On 3 February 2014 at 17:34 Elmer van Chastelet tagged 42

On 17 October 2014 at 16:30 Elmer van Chastelet removed tag 42

On 17 October 2014 at 16:30 Elmer van Chastelet tagged 43

On 5 November 2014 at 12:24 Elmer van Chastelet removed tag 43

On 5 November 2014 at 12:24 Elmer van Chastelet tagged 44

On 13 February 2015 at 09:54 Mathijs de Weerdt commented:

I think I have a related example where grades from level3 do not propagate to level2:
http://weblab.tudelft.nl/submission/1659/2330
Here grades for exercise 2-4 are 14, 5, 4 while the overall grade is 5.0.
Note that for the first exercise I don’t want the grade to be included in the overview, so I’ve checked that option.


On 14 February 2015 at 13:08 Mathijs de Weerdt commented:

It may also have to do with the way the grade is added: in the normal way or using the “override grade”.


On 19 February 2015 at 09:56 Elmer van Chastelet removed tag 44

On 19 February 2015 at 09:56 Elmer van Chastelet tagged 49

On 19 February 2015 at 09:57 Elmer van Chastelet tagged 44

On 19 February 2015 at 09:57 Elmer van Chastelet removed tag 49

On 3 March 2015 at 21:08 Elmer van Chastelet closed this issue.

Log in to post comments