example:

entity User {
  prim : String
  ref  : User
  derived : String := "test"
}
Submitted by Danny Groenewegen on 18 January 2013 at 13:43

On 18 January 2013 at 13:54 Danny Groenewegen commented:

added in r5601


On 18 January 2013 at 13:54 Danny Groenewegen closed this issue.

On 18 January 2013 at 13:54 Danny Groenewegen tagged 1.3.0

On 18 January 2013 at 13:58 Elmer van Chastelet commented:

That would be a nice improvement. Instead of having this set of property kind notations [::,->,<>], the new notation will be limited to [:,<>] (old notation still allowed). Or do you have something else in mind to specify a composition (<>) property? I assume that the : notation will default to a reference (old notation: ->) kind of property in case of an entity or collection property.


On 18 January 2013 at 14:04 Danny Groenewegen commented:

The : is an additional option, you can still use the old kind notation. The : is desugared to either :: or -> depending on the type.

Log in to post comments