AJF-29: Class member name patterns should use type patterns
Reported by Pavel:> Similarly, for ClassMemberNamePattern, TypePatterns need to be allowed:
> call(* A[].foo()) and get(int A[].length) are both valid syntax.> This is actually not general enough – rather than having
Submitted on 8 June 2006 at 09:28
> ClassNamePatterns there, full TypePatterns should be allowed:
Log in to post comments