Would be nice to have.

Submitted by Tobi Vollebregt on 8 February 2012 at 14:49

On 8 February 2012 at 14:49 Tobi Vollebregt tagged testing

On 8 February 2012 at 15:10 Lennart Kats commented:

String literals where exactly? You can already use "


On 8 February 2012 at 15:27 Tobi Vollebregt commented:

Oh, it appears syntactically it is accepted. However, a test like the one displayed below fails, while it succeeds if the string is written on one line as “foo\nbar”.

test bla
=> “foo

Maybe an issue with insufficient / too much escaping when comparing strings?

On 8 February 2012 at 15:38 Lennart Kats commented:

Ah, so you mean the string literals in the match pattern for strategies. Those may be handled differently from string literals in normal (builder) tests…

Log in to post comments