Improve rule foo() handling
Since defining a template is done by “define foo”, it is intuitive to also type “rule foo” (rather than the expected “rule template foo”. It would be helpful to explicitly catch this error, recover, and tell the user what they did wrong (rather than breaking the parser).
Submitted by Sverre Rabbelier on 4 February 2011 at 16:09
Issue Log
On 4 February 2011 at 17:11 Lennart Kats closed this issue.
On 4 February 2011 at 17:11 Lennart Kats commented:
Isn’t this a WebDSL issue? Moved.
On 4 February 2011 at 17:12 Lennart Kats tagged moved
On 4 February 2011 at 17:12 Sverre Rabbelier commented:
Ah, I suppose it is, thanks :).
On 4 February 2011 at 19:40 Eelco Visser commented:
+1 (on the issue)
Log in to post comments