Data Import workflow improvements
Submitted by Elmer van Chastelet on 8 July 2019 at 14:56
Idea: Rather than baby sitting each paper, it would be better to let the user focus on the data that need attention. So, if there is an exact email match, there should be no need to review an author. Also, it is not necessary to edit the title and abstract in the case of a HotCRP import; a chair is not going to edit those in researchr.
I also have two papers without authors since I have a conflict with those papers. Those should be flagged as well of course (i.e. papers/events without authors).